Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

2nd Flr 20 Old Bailey, EC4M 7AN

Office and Premises Decided 31 July 2025 CHG100547691 Knight Frank - Bjorn Bowles

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£242,000£525/m²
Ratepayer sought£260,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£260,000£500/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 12 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the unadjusted base rate of £525 psm in the 2017 Rating List for multiple office floors at 20 Old Bailey, London, arguing for £475 psm (later revised from £450 psm). The tribunal heard rental evidence from within the subject building and comparable properties (10 Old Bailey at £480 psm and 60 Ludgate Hill at £550 psm), as well as analysing the physical differences of the subject property. The tribunal found the current RV unreasonable and determined that an unadjusted base rate of £500 psm was reasonable, reflecting the subject property's position between the comparable properties, and reduced the RVs accordingly.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Metro Bank plc, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Dawn Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 906
Hearing
1 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.