2nd Flr 20 Old Bailey, EC4M 7AN
Office and Premises Decided 31 July 2025 CHG100547691 Knight Frank
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 12 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (2ND FLR, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4). Every property is listed below.
The 12 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PT LGND FLR, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | £242,000 | — | £260,000 | Allowed in part |
| PT GND FLR, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £410,000 | Allowed in part |
| 1ST FLR, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £890,000 | Allowed in part |
| 2ND FLR, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4This appeal | — | — | £1,200,000 | Allowed in part |
| 2ND FLR, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £1,200,000 | Allowed in part |
| 3RD & 4TH FLRS, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £2,330,000 | Allowed in part |
| 3RD & 4TH FLRS, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £2,160,000 | Allowed in part |
| 3RD & 4TH FLRS, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £2,330,000 | Allowed in part |
| PT GND FLR NORTH, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £249,000 | Allowed in part |
| PT GND FLR NORTH, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £230,000 | Allowed in part |
| PT GND FLR NORTH, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £249,000 | Allowed in part |
| PT 5TH FLR WEST-9TH FLR, 20 Old Bailey, London EC4 | — | — | £3,270,000 | Allowed in part |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the unadjusted base rate of £525 psm in the 2017 Rating List for multiple office floors at 20 Old Bailey, London, arguing for £475 psm (later revised from £450 psm). The tribunal heard rental evidence from within the subject building and comparable properties (10 Old Bailey at £480 psm and 60 Ludgate Hill at £550 psm), as well as analysing the physical differences of the subject property. The tribunal found the current RV unreasonable and determined that an unadjusted base rate of £500 psm was reasonable, reflecting the subject property's position between the comparable properties, and reduced the RVs accordingly.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Metro Bank plc, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Dawn Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 906
- Hearing
- 1 July 2025
Similar decisions
- LUTRON (INC 101-106 FENCHURCH STREET), PT 4TH F 52-54, LEADENHALL STREET, EC3A 2BJ — Allowed in part, 25 Sept 2026
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.