Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Hull City Council · 2017 rating list

4 & 6 Sheds, 3 Quay, King George Dock, HU9 5PR

Warehouse and premises (warehouse, wharf and premises) Decided 26 February 2024 CHG100638276 Business Rates

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2017 list£380,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£400,000
Tribunal decided£380,000from 1 Apr 2018

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (4 & 6 Sheds, 3 Quay, King George Dock, Hull, HU9 5PR). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
4 & 6 Sheds, 3 Quay, King George Dock, Hull, HU9 5PR£472,500—£465,000Allowed in part
4 & 6 Sheds, 3 Quay, King George Dock, Hull, HU9 5PRThis appeal£380,000—£380,000Allowed in part
Shed 6, 3 Quay, King George Dock, Hull, HU9 5PR£560,000—£525,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought reductions in wharf length, land area, and claimed a 10% end allowance for layout/shape. The tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's revised values after the VO reduced its challenge case decision offers. The appellant's contentions regarding wharf length reduction from 199m to 150m (or 400m to 300m as at 1 January 2019), one-third reduction in circulation land area, and the 10% end allowance for layout were all rejected. The tribunal found no evidence of insufficient demand or unusable access, distinguished the cited comparables from different dock locations, and determined that once Shed 4 was removed there was no justification for the 10% end allowance.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Thor Shipping & Transport UK Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Floor area or measurement
  • Quantum or end allowance
  • Zoning or layout
Evidence
Photographs, Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
30 January 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Hull City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.