Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Hull City Council · 2017 rating list

UNIT B LINK, 63 LIVERPOOL STREET, HU3 4XT

Office and Premises Decided 3 July 2023 CHG100791772 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£24,250
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£24,250from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 5 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit B Link 63, Liverpool Street, Hull HU3 4XT). Every property is listed below.

The 5 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
6 Beacon Way, Hull HU3 4AE£188,000—£188,000Dismissed
69A Scarborough Street, Hull HU3 4TG£8,800—£8,800Dismissed
Unit E, Venture Business Park, Witty Street, Hull, HU3 4EL£8,700—£8,700Dismissed
Unit B Link 63, Liverpool Street, Hull HU3 4XTThis appeal£24,250—£24,250Dismissed
Unit 3, Venture Business Park, Witty Street, Hull, HU3 4TT£13,500—£13,500Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants sought a 2.5% reduction in rateable values for five properties affected by the A63 Castle Street Road improvement scheme. They argued the roadworks would cause significant disruption including lane closures, diversions, temporary traffic controls and congestion. The tribunal found insufficient evidence that the properties, situated 0.6 to 1.44 miles from the scheme, were impacted to an extent that would affect a hypothetical tenant's rental bid, despite comparable allowances being agreed for other schemes, and dismissed all five appeals.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Rradar Limited, RMC Digital Print, Ventilation Centre Ltd, Arco Limited & Humberside G.E.S Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
road works
Evidence
Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v Jackson (VO)
Hearing
26 June 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in Hull City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.