Tribunals · Preston City Council · 2017 rating list

Cafe Vienna, Fishergate Centre, PR1 8HJ

Café and premises Decided 27 April 2022 CHG100681704 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£51,000£374.48/m²
Ratepayer sought£18,000
VO conceded first£47,000−8% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£47,000£350/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in the rateable value from £47,000 to £18,000, arguing for a reduction in the price per m2 from £350 to £150 and claiming allowances of 5% each for lack of toilet facilities and access/security restrictions due to shopping centre closure at 6pm. The tribunal rejected these arguments, finding the rental evidence (an agreed rent of £55,000 per annum reviewed in 2017 with no change) most compelling, supported by comparable properties within the same shopping centre which had higher rates per m2. The tribunal concluded that the lack of toilets and the shopping centre hours would have been known factors when the lease was negotiated, and were therefore already reflected in the rental value.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Mocca on the Balcony, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Relief or exemption
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
20 April 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Preston City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.