Tribunals · Preston City Council · 2017 rating list

CHIQUITO, PORTWAY, ASHTON ON RIBBLE, ASHTON ON RIBBLE, PR2 2YB

Restaurant and premises Decided 6 December 2024 CHG100846480 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£76,000£240/m²
Ratepayer sought£0
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£76,000£259.7/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought deletion of the restaurant property's rating list entry as at 1 April 2021, contending the property was not capable of beneficial occupation due to poor repair condition, with estimated repair costs of around £197,714. The tribunal found that the property remained capable of beneficial occupation, and that a hypothetical landlord would consider repair costs economically reasonable to undertake, based on comparable rental evidence showing similar properties let at around £250-£525 per m², with the landlord able to recoup repair costs (estimated between £145,000-£200,000) within two to three years.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.

Grounds argued

  • State of repair or deletion · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Civil Aviation Authority v Langford (VO) and Camden BC; Thomas & Davies v Denly (VO); Princes St Ltd (Ipswich) v Bond (VO); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
Hearing
12 November 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Preston City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.