Unit 22, Stadium Way, Parkgate Retail World, Parkgate Retail World, S60 1TG
Single storey modern restaurant Decided 12 February 2024 CHG100737616 Colliers International - Alastair Dyson
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the rateable value should be reduced from £139,000 (£440/m²) to £119,000 (£375/m²), contending that the full rent-free period should be deducted, the analysis period should extend to 10 years rather than to the break clause at 15 years, and that a 10% uplift for fitting out constituted double-counting. The tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's approach of analysing rent to the break clause, deducting only three months of a nine-month rent-free period as standard for fitting out, and applying the 10% uplift. The tribunal found the respondent's rental analysis supporting £440/m² was not unreasonable and dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Frankie and Benny's, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Valuation method · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Bunyan v Acenden Ltd; Allen v Freemans PLC; Morrison E F (GP) ltd v Central Scotland Assessor; K Shoe Shops Ltd v Hardy; Vines Ltd v De Mauny; Lamb v Minards; Lamb v Go Outdoors Ltd
- Hearing
- 29 January 2024
Similar decisions
- Church House, Church Street, S63 7RD — Allowed, 21 May 2024
- Costa Coffee Drive Thru, 23 Retail World, S60 1TG — Allowed in part, 19 Feb 2024
All decisions in Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.