Tribunals · East Hertfordshire District Council · 2017 rating list

UNIT E, WATERMILL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, ASPENDEN ROAD, ASPENDEN ROAD, SG9 9JS

Warehouse and premises Decided 31 July 2023 CHG100781079 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£55,500£60/m²
Ratepayer sought£46,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£55,500£60/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the property was completed in 2003 and should be valued in a different valuation scheme at £50/m2 rather than £60/m2, resulting in a lower RV of £46,250. The tribunal found that the evidence provided (a completion handover document from the structural engineer dated 30 October 2003 and an aerial photograph from October 2003) was insufficient to override the evidence that the property was entered into the rating list on 10 January 2004 with that effective date confirmed on site by the VO's inspection on 18 February 2004. The tribunal dismissed the appeal and confirmed the RV at £55,500 with effect from 1 April 2017.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Dun-Bri Services Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal · decisive
Evidence
Settled assessments, Expert report, Photographs
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
10 July 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.