UNIT 5, FOUNTAIN DRIVE, SG13 7UB
Warehouse and Premises Decided 13 September 2023 CHG100787427 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the RV of £19,500 (£90/m2) arguing that £80/m2 (£17,500) was fair and reasonable based on comparable rental evidence and assessments of similar industrial properties in the locality. The tribunal found the appellant's evidence more persuasive, noting the rental analysis of comparable units and tone reductions agreed in the valuation scheme, and determined that £80/m2 was appropriate.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was John A Hart Carpet Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; Saintta Global Lawyers (UK) Ltd v Ricketts
- Hearing
- 23 August 2023
Similar decisions
- UNIT E, WATERMILL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, ASPENDEN ROAD, ASPENDEN ROAD, SG9 9JS — Dismissed, 31 Jul 2023
All decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.