Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

2 ND FLR 20, OLD BAILEY,, EC4M 7BH

Office and Premises Decided 31 July 2025 CHG100803082 CBRE - David Shuttleworth

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£242,000£525/m²
Ratepayer sought£475
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£260,000£500/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 12 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the rateable values shown in the 2017 Rating List were wrong, seeking a base rate of £475 psm (later revised from £450 psm). The Tribunal found that the current rateable values at £525 psm were unreasonable. Based on comparable evidence from 10 Old Bailey (£480 psm for a newbuild property) and 60 Ludgate Hill (£550 psm for a 2015 newbuild), and noting that the subject property (refurbished 2018) was superior to the former but inferior to the latter, the Tribunal determined a revised base rate of £500 psm was reasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Metro Bank plc, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, comparable_assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Dawn Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC); Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 906
Hearing
1 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.