Tribunals · City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council · 2017 rating list

Unit 1G, Sapper Jordan Rossi Park, Baildon, BD17 7AX

Factory and workshop Decided 14 October 2024 CHG100812246 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£16,000
Ratepayer sought£14,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£16,000£55/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the ground floor should receive a relativity of 0.7 because it was restricted by the first floor structure and supporting columns, similar to mezzanine properties. The tribunal found that whilst a height restriction justified a 5% allowance (already applied), the first floor was integral to the building's structure rather than an addition, and comparable properties on the same estate with similar construction had received no additional relativity. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the base rate of £55.00/m² with 2.5% heating and 5% height allowances was reasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was International Moisture Analysers Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
23 September 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.