Tribunals · South Gloucestershire Council · 2017 rating list

Home Bargains, Ground Floor, 21-27 South Walk, 21-27 South Walk, BS37 4AU

Shop and premises Decided 7 February 2024 CHG100850927 The Beattie Partnership

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£224,000
Ratepayer sought£139,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£183,000£575/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the property should be valued on an overall basis rather than zoning method to avoid an apparent anomaly from the property split, or alternatively with a 40% quantum allowance. The tribunal found the property should be valued using the zoning method with a zone A rate of £575/m2, consistent with settled tone of value in the locality and the VO's scheme. However, the tribunal awarded a 20% quantum allowance (rather than the VO's 2.5% or the appellant's 40%) to reflect the unit being larger than most others in the shopping centre, resulting in an RV of £183,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was T J Morris Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Zoning or layout
  • Quantum or end allowance
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, tone_of_list_comparables, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner and Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
24 January 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in South Gloucestershire Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.