DAWES CYCLES LTD 154, WHARFDALE ROAD, B11 2DG
Factory and premises Decided 15 July 2024 CHG100884361 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the RV of £220,000, proposing £167,000 based on a reduced main space rate of £21 per m2 for Survey Unit 2 and removal of 1150m2 of hard surfaced land from the valuation. The tribunal upheld the respondent's tone of value at £35 per m2, finding the respondent's rental evidence from a comparable unit and five other comparable assessments of similar age with same or higher tones of value to be persuasive, while attaching little weight to the appellant's comparables which were significantly older. The tribunal also upheld inclusion of the land, finding it was properly valued as an additional feature with a reasonable 610m2 disregard for circulation and access already made.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Kozee Sleep (Midlands) Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 26 June 2024
Similar decisions
- Alistair Mackintosh Ltd, Bannerley Road, B33 0SL — Allowed in part, 12 Jan 2026
- Kwik Fit, 2119 Coventry Road, B26 3EA — Dismissed, 31 Dec 2025
- BASS BREWERS TECHNICAL SERVICES BEAUFORT HOUSE, FIRST AVENUE, MINWORTH, MINWORTH, B76 1BA — Allowed in part, 23 Dec 2025
- UNIT 2 HURRICANE PARK, HEARTLANDS PARKWAY, B7 5PJ — Dismissed, 18 Dec 2025
All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.