Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2017 rating list

DAWES CYCLES LTD 154, WHARFDALE ROAD, B11 2DG

Factory and premises Decided 15 July 2024 CHG100884361 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£220,000£35/m²
Ratepayer sought£167,000
VO conceded first£215,000−2% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£215,000£35/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the RV of £220,000, proposing £167,000 based on a reduced main space rate of £21 per m2 for Survey Unit 2 and removal of 1150m2 of hard surfaced land from the valuation. The tribunal upheld the respondent's tone of value at £35 per m2, finding the respondent's rental evidence from a comparable unit and five other comparable assessments of similar age with same or higher tones of value to be persuasive, while attaching little weight to the appellant's comparables which were significantly older. The tribunal also upheld inclusion of the land, finding it was properly valued as an additional feature with a reasonable 610m2 disregard for circulation and access already made.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Kozee Sleep (Midlands) Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
26 June 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.