Alistair Mackintosh Ltd, Bannerley Road, B33 0SL
Workshop and premises Decided 12 January 2026 CHG101164126 Rabbette Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the subject hereditament was incorrectly valued at £38 per m² (reduced to £32 per m² by the VO), contending it should be valued at £26 per m² with a 10% layout allowance rather than 5%. The tribunal found that the comparable properties provided by the appellant (particularly 22 Fortnum Close and Magnum House, with rates of £24 per m²) were more persuasive than those from the VO, due to their similar construction, proximity and size. The tribunal reduced the unadjusted rate to £26 per m² but upheld the existing 5% layout allowance, allowing the appeal in part and reducing the RV from £81,000 to £61,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Alistair Mackintosh Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 15 December 2025
Similar decisions
- Kwik Fit, 2119 Coventry Road, B26 3EA — Dismissed, 31 Dec 2025
- BASS BREWERS TECHNICAL SERVICES BEAUFORT HOUSE, FIRST AVENUE, MINWORTH, MINWORTH, B76 1BA — Allowed in part, 23 Dec 2025
- UNIT 2 HURRICANE PARK, HEARTLANDS PARKWAY, B7 5PJ — Dismissed, 18 Dec 2025
- Express Point, Wood Lane, b24 9ql — Allowed in part, 17 Dec 2025
All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.