BST & GND FLRS, 227 TOTTENHAM COURT ROAD, W1T 7QE
Bank and premises Decided 7 November 2025 CHG100916888 Knight Frank - Bjorn Bowles
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the vault and staff room should be valued as separate line entries at discounted rates rather than zoned through with the retail space, citing the VOA Rating Manual and the rebus sic stantibus principle from Scottish and Newcastle Retail v Williams. The tribunal accepted that the vault constituted a significant non-permanent structural alteration and, referencing comparable properties (particularly 75 Piccadilly where similar vault provisions were agreed at reduced rates), determined that separate valuation entries with lower rates were appropriate, reducing the RV from £425,000 to £347,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Metro Bank PLC, represented.
Grounds argued
- Valuation method · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Scottish and Newcastle Retail v Williams
- Hearing
- 13 October 2025
Similar decisions
- INLINK OUTSIDE 29-31 HAMPSTEAD ROAD, NW1 3JA — Dismissed, 10 Feb 2025
- BT INLINK ADJ 7 GREVILLE STREET, EC1N 8PQ — Dismissed, 10 Feb 2025
- INLINK OUTSIDE 338 EUSTON ROAD, NW1 3BT — Dismissed, 10 Feb 2025
- BT INLINK O/S 26, TOLMRS SQUARE, NW1 2PE — Dismissed, 10 Feb 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.