Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

INLINK OUTSIDE 338 EUSTON ROAD, NW1 3BT

Advertising right and premises Decided 10 February 2025 CHG101096988 Colliers International - Guy Richardson

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£6,600
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£6,600from 1 Jun 2019

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

BT appealed for deletion of an advertising right on a StreetHub digital display unit, arguing that the screens constitute plant rather than land as defined in section 64(11) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988. The tribunal found that the StreetHub structure falls within the statutory definition of land (including signs, hoardings, frames, posts and other structures), and therefore the right to use the screens for advertising constitutes a valid hereditament under section 64(2). The appeal was dismissed and the assessment remains in the rating list at £6,600.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was British Telecommunications Plc, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
Expert report, Photographs
Cases cited
Karl List (VO) v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
Hearing
13 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.