POUNDLAND 23, FORE STREET, PL25 5PS
Retail unit and premises Decided 10 January 2024 CHG100921150 Colliers International - Daniel Johnstone
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the property was over-assessed and should be valued at £320/m² Zone A instead of £390/m². The tribunal found that the original rate of £390/m² was too high but that the appellant's proposed £320/m² was too low. The tribunal determined that £360/m² Zone A was the most appropriate rate based on the most relevant rental evidence (particularly properties at 27, 32 and 38 Fore Street) and the property's location, resulting in an RV of £94,000 instead of the original £102,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Poundland, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 11 December 2023
Similar decisions
- Unit C, Helston Business Park, TR13 8FZ — Allowed in part, 28 Feb 2025
- The Works, 27 Fore Street, PL25 5PX — Allowed in part, 9 Jan 2024
- Hunter And Walsh Hairdressing, 27B Market Place, TR18 2JD — Allowed in part, 5 Jan 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.