Unit C, Helston Business Park, TR13 8FZ
Builders Merchants and Premises Decided 28 February 2025 CHG101069894 Knight Frank - Emma Foster
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction from £93,500 RV to £65,500 RV, arguing the unit area rate (UAR) of £65.00/m² was excessive and should be £42.50/m². The tribunal found the current assessment was unreasonable. Relying on comparable property assessments within the same valuation scheme rather than rental evidence (which was remote from the AVD), the tribunal determined the appropriate UAR was £50.00/m², resulting in an RV of £75,000, which fairly reflected the subject property's attributes including its modern construction, size, and location.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Bradford & Sons, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 30 January 2025
Similar decisions
- POUNDLAND 23, FORE STREET, PL25 5PS — Allowed in part, 10 Jan 2024
- The Works, 27 Fore Street, PL25 5PX — Allowed in part, 9 Jan 2024
- Hunter And Walsh Hairdressing, 27B Market Place, TR18 2JD — Allowed in part, 5 Jan 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.