40 Market Street, NN8 1AA
Retail premises Decided 24 June 2024 CHG101060381 Cushman & Wakefield - Nicholas Walton
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 8 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants argued that the assessments of eight retail properties in Wellingborough did not reflect the adverse effects of the opening of Rushden Lakes Shopping Centre in July 2017 and its expansion in June 2019, which had drawn footfall and revenue away from the town centre. The tribunal allowed seven appeals and allowed one in part with 10% reductions agreed between the parties, finding that Wellingborough fell within the same locality as Rushden Lakes as established in a prior tribunal decision, and that the material change of circumstances had occurred on 28 June 2019 (the date of the expansion).
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Barclays Bank Plc, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances · decisive
- Change of circumstances
- Rushden Lakes Shopping Centre opening and expansion
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Hearing
- 12 June 2024
Similar decisions
- National Westminster Bank Plc, 43 High Street, NN10 0QE — Dismissed, 1 Jul 2024
- Poundland, 8-11 Corn Lane, NN8 1EZ — Allowed, 24 Jun 2024
- 43, Spring Lane, NN8 1EY — Allowed in part, 24 Jun 2024
- 21, Spring Lane, NN8 1EY — Allowed, 24 Jun 2024
All decisions in North Northamptonshire Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.