1ST AND (EXC NORTH) PT 2ND FLR, 60 LUDGATE HILL, EC4M 7AW
Offices and premises Decided 20 July 2026 CHG101078712 Montagu Evans - Chris Morrow
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants, represented by surveyors from Montagu Evans, Knight Frank, Dalton Warner Davis, Graham + Sibbald and Colliers International, challenged the rateable value of offices at 60 Ludgate Hill on the grounds that the price per m2 of £550 was unreasonable and should be reduced to £535 per m2, based on rental evidence from within the building. The tribunal considered rental evidence from within the subject building ranging from £504 to £707.50 per m2 and found that two rents fell below the adopted price of £550 and two fell above it. The tribunal concluded that at £550 per m2, the adopted price was not unreasonable and dismissed the appeals.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Commonwealth Bank of Australia, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 26 June 2026
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.