Commonwealth Bank Of Australia, Commonwealth Bank Of Australia, EC4M 7AW
Offices and premises Decided 20 July 2026 CHG101079278 Montagu Evans - Chris Morrow
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants (through their agents) challenged the adopted price of £550 per m2 on the basis that rental evidence and comparable assessments supported a lower price of £535 per m2. The tribunal reviewed rental evidence from within 60 Ludgate Hill and found that two rents analysed below £550 per m2 (£504 and £519) and two analysed above (£629 and £600), leading to the conclusion that £550 per m2 was not unreasonable. The appeals were dismissed and the entries confirmed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Commonwealth Bank of Australia, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 26 June 2026
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.