Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Chelmsford City Council · 2017 rating list

8 High Street, CM1 1BE

Shop and premises Decided 8 October 2025 CHG101085284 Newmark

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2017 list£61,000
Ratepayer sought£53,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£53,500from 3 Jan 2022

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (8 HIGH STREET, CHELMSFORD CM1 1BE). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
7 HIGH STREET, CHELMSFORD CM1 1BE£67,000—£60,300Allowed in part
8 HIGH STREET, CHELMSFORD CM1 1BEThis appeal£61,000£53,500£53,500Allowed in part
96 HIGH STREET, CHELMSFORD CM1 1BE£39,000£34,250£34,250Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that redevelopment works at Tindal Square materially affected the subject properties (food and beverage outlets), proposing a 15% MCC allowance. The Tribunal found that the works—including excavation, fencing, access restrictions, and closure of external seating areas—would have reduced a prospective tenant's rental bid. Trading figures for one outlet showed a 15-31% downturn during the works. The Tribunal rejected the 15% allowance but awarded 10% for Five Guys (no external seating impact) and 12% for Costa and Café Nero, finding these reductions appropriate to reflect the temporary impact on trade.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Five Guys JV Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances
Change of circumstances
redevelopment building works
Evidence
Trading accounts, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
2 September 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Chelmsford City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.