Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead · 2023 rating list

UNIT 1 SWITCHBACK OFFICE PARK, GARDNER ROAD, SL6 7RJ

Offices and premises Decided 27 July 2026 CHG101107389 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£106,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£96,000from 21 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (UNIT 1 SWITCHBACK OFFICE PARK, GARDNER ROAD, MAIDENHEAD SL6 7RJ). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
UNIT 1 SWITCHBACK OFFICE PARK, GARDNER ROAD, MAIDENHEAD SL6 7RJThis appeal£106,000—£96,000Allowed in part
UNIT 6 SWITCHBACK OFFICE PARK, GARDNER ROAD, MAIDENHEAD SL6 7RJ£107,000—£97,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the original rateable values of £106,000 and £107,000 (at £250/m²) were excessive and sought a reduction to £175/m². They relied on rental evidence from other Switchback units and argued that comparable properties at Foundation Park demonstrated over-valuation. The tribunal found that Foundation Park units, though superior, evidenced that £250/m² was unreasonable, but the appellant's proposed £175/m² was not fully supported by the totality of evidence. The tribunal determined £225/m² was reasonable, resulting in reduced RVs of £96,000 and £97,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AVIRE TRADING LIMITED and CCL LABEL LIMITED, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
30 June 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.