UNIT 1 SWITCHBACK OFFICE PARK, GARDNER ROAD, SL6 7RJ
Offices and premises Decided 27 July 2026 CHG101107389 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants argued that the original rateable values of £106,000 and £107,000 (at £250/m²) were excessive and sought a reduction to £175/m². They relied on rental evidence from other Switchback units and argued that comparable properties at Foundation Park demonstrated over-valuation. The tribunal found that Foundation Park units, though superior, evidenced that £250/m² was unreasonable, but the appellant's proposed £175/m² was not fully supported by the totality of evidence. The tribunal determined £225/m² was reasonable, resulting in reduced RVs of £96,000 and £97,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AVIRE TRADING LIMITED and CCL LABEL LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 30 June 2026
Similar decisions
- UNIT 6 SWITCHBACK OFFICE PARK, GARDNER ROAD, SL6 7RJ — Allowed in part, 27 Jul 2026
- 3rd Floor Clarion House, Norreys Drive, SL6 4BN — Allowed in part, 8 Jan 2026
- GND FLR LHS KINGS GATE 1, GRENFELL ROAD, SL6 1HN — Dismissed, 24 Apr 2025
- 3 RD FLR MORGAN HOUSE, MADEIRA WALK, SL4 1EP — Dismissed, 1 Mar 2025
All decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.