Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2017 rating list

Seventh To Seventeenth Floors, Three Snowhill, B4 6GA

Offices and premises Decided 10 June 2025 CHG101129595 Colliers

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2017 list£3,970,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£3,970,000
Tribunal decided£3,750,000from 24 Jan 2022

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 5 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (7th to 17th Floors, Three Snowhill, Birmingham B4 6GA). Every property is listed below.

The 5 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
7th to 17th Floors, Three Snowhill, Birmingham B4 6GAThis appeal£3,970,000—£3,750,000Allowed in part
7th to 14th Floors, Three Snowhill, Birmingham B4 6GA£3,160,000—£3,080,000Allowed in part
12th to 14th Floors, Three Snowhill, Birmingham B4 6GA£1,330,000—£1,300,000Allowed in part
7th to 9th Floors, Three Snowhill, Birmingham B4 6GA£1,250,000—£1,220,000Allowed in part
16th to 17th Floors, Three Snowhill, Birmingham B4 6GA£755,000—£740,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in the unadopted rate from £215/m² to £190/m² for five office assessments across Three Snowhill, plus an increased quantum allowance for one property. The tribunal found the best comparables were One and Two Snowhill, both assessed at £210/m², and rejected the VO's arguments for a £215/m² rate based on newness and additional facilities. The tribunal also allowed an increased quantum allowance of 25% for the largest assessment, having regard to the pattern of allowances already agreed for the other four properties.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was British Telecommunications PLC, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
Hearing
3 June 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.