Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2023 rating list

Suite R11 Part Fifth Floor, Scala House, 36 Holloway Circus Queensway, 36 Holloway Circus Queensway, B1 1EQ

Office and premises Decided 5 June 2026 VT00034416 Bell & Bell

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£4,050£120/m²
Ratepayer sought£2,475
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£3,900£120/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the certified transitional certificate value of £4,050 for the office property, proposing £2,475 based on comparative evidence from an adjacent suite and claiming end allowances for lack of heating and poor condition. The tribunal found the floor area should be revised from 33.84m² to 32.8m², which both parties accepted. While the tribunal was not satisfied that the appellant had adequately evidenced the claimed end allowances due to lack of photographic and comparative evidence, it recalculated the value using the corrected area at £120/m² to determine £3,900. The appeal was allowed in part with the certified value reduced from £4,050 to £3,900 as at 31 March 2023.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Gatwick Investments Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Floor area or measurement
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
10 April 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.