Tribunals · City of London Corporation · 2017 rating list

25 Moorgate, EC2R 6BT

Office and premises Decided 9 February 2026 CHG101138359 CBRE - David Hill

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£3,060,000
Ratepayer sought£2,600,000
VO conceded first£2,910,000−5% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£2,750,000from 8 Nov 2021

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a 15% allowance for disturbance caused by major demolition and redevelopment works at adjacent properties that started in November 2021, with significant impact on all sides of the appeal property through noise, dust, vibrations, and visual impact. The tribunal found the VO's 5% allowance was insufficient but rejected the 15% claim, holding that while the appeal property suffered greater impact than comparable properties at 41 Moorgate (which received 7.5%), the evidence did not support the full 15% sought. The tribunal concluded a 10% allowance was appropriate, resulting in a revised RV of £2,750,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Tilney Smith and Williamson, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Building works or disturbance nearby
  • Quantum or end allowance · decisive
Change of circumstances
demolition and redevelopment works
Evidence
Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
15 January 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.