25 Moorgate, EC2R 6BT
Office and premises Decided 9 February 2026 CHG101138359 CBRE - David Hill
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a 15% allowance for disturbance caused by major demolition and redevelopment works at adjacent properties that started in November 2021, with significant impact on all sides of the appeal property through noise, dust, vibrations, and visual impact. The tribunal found the VO's 5% allowance was insufficient but rejected the 15% claim, holding that while the appeal property suffered greater impact than comparable properties at 41 Moorgate (which received 7.5%), the evidence did not support the full 15% sought. The tribunal concluded a 10% allowance was appropriate, resulting in a revised RV of £2,750,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Tilney Smith and Williamson, represented.
Grounds argued
- Building works or disturbance nearby
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Change of circumstances
- demolition and redevelopment works
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 15 January 2026
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.