1 ST FLR SOUTH AQUIS HOUSE, BLAGRAVE STREET, RG1 1PW
Offices and premises Decided 4 December 2025 CHG101142694 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable values of two Grade A office properties, arguing that the unadjusted base rate of £325/m² should be reduced to £275/m² based on comparable lettings of properties in Category B condition with rents averaging £271.09/m². The tribunal found that the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the comparable properties were genuinely let in Category B condition or to establish the cost of fit-outs required under the Acenden framework, and therefore the burden of proof had not been discharged to show the current assessments were excessive.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Dawn Bunyan v Acenden Limited; Hitchings v Shoosmiths LLP and Mando Group Ltd; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 5 November 2025
Similar decisions
- Pt 7th Floor The Blade, Abbey Street, RG1 3BA — Dismissed, 17 Jun 2026
- PT 13TH FLR, THE BLADE, ABBEY STREET, RG1 3BA — Dismissed, 4 Dec 2025
- Unit 5, Broughton Close, RG30 1DZ — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
All decisions in Reading Borough Council · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.