Tribunals · London Borough of Waltham Forest · 2017 rating list

Jaylow House, Argall Avenue, E10 7FD

Warehouse and premises Decided 18 November 2025 CHG101147738 JMA Chartered Surveyors

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£342,500£80/m²
Ratepayer sought£248,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£297,500£70/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of a warehouse and premises, arguing the main space price should be reduced from £80/m² to £65/m² and that fragmentation and shape allowances should apply. The tribunal found the main space price should be reduced to £70/m², comparing the subject property to similar units in the valuation scheme, particularly Unit 3 Thames Gateway Park. However, the tribunal rejected the requested fragmentation and shape allowances, finding the two large doorways and external access to the extension did not support a rental discount, and the angle of the extension wall was not sufficiently sharp to warrant an allowance. The tribunal reduced the RV from £342,500 to £297,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Jaylow Supplies Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Zoning or layout
Evidence
Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
Hearing
22 October 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Waltham Forest · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.