Tribunals · London Borough of Newham · 2023 rating list

TAXCA Accountants Ltd, 353 High Street North, E12 6PQ

Shop and premises Decided 19 September 2024 CHG101165080

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£25,500£530/m²
Ratepayer sought£18,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£25,500£530/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, operating an accountants office in shop premises, argued the property should be valued as an office at an overall rate of £131/m² (RV £18,500) rather than as a shop at zone A rate of £530/m² (RV £25,500). The tribunal found that while the appellant had made considerable non-structural alterations, a hypothetical tenant viewing the vacant property would regard it as a shop in a parade of shops, and the vacant-and-to-let assessment should therefore be on a shop basis. Having regard to comparable rents in the parade (£495.66-£801.08/m²) and the rental evidence, the tribunal found the zone A rate of £530/m² and resulting RV of £25,500 to be reasonable and within the appropriate range for such properties.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was TAXCA Accountants Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Williams v Scottish & Newcastle; Fir Mill Ltd v Royton UDC and Jones
Hearing
22 August 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Newham · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.