TAXCA Accountants Ltd, 353 High Street North, E12 6PQ
Shop and premises Decided 19 September 2024 CHG101165080
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, operating an accountants office in shop premises, argued the property should be valued as an office at an overall rate of £131/m² (RV £18,500) rather than as a shop at zone A rate of £530/m² (RV £25,500). The tribunal found that while the appellant had made considerable non-structural alterations, a hypothetical tenant viewing the vacant property would regard it as a shop in a parade of shops, and the vacant-and-to-let assessment should therefore be on a shop basis. Having regard to comparable rents in the parade (£495.66-£801.08/m²) and the rental evidence, the tribunal found the zone A rate of £530/m² and resulting RV of £25,500 to be reasonable and within the appropriate range for such properties.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was TAXCA Accountants Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Williams v Scottish & Newcastle; Fir Mill Ltd v Royton UDC and Jones
- Hearing
- 22 August 2024
Similar decisions
- 384 Green Street, E13 9AP — Dismissed, 9 Jan 2026
- GRND FLR & BSMT 568-570 Barking Road, E13 9JU — Dismissed, 15 May 2024
- UNIT 2 BECKTON RETAIL PARK, ALPINE WAY, E6 6LA — Dismissed, 13 Apr 2023
- Boots, 833 Romford Road, E12 6EA — Allowed, 24 Mar 2021
All decisions in London Borough of Newham · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.