384 Green Street, E13 9AP
Shop and premises Decided 9 January 2026 CHG101217085 GL Hearn Limited - Star 2017
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought to reduce the rateable value from £86,500 (Zone A rate of £1,175/m²) to £75,500 (Zone A rate of £1,025/m²), arguing that comparable rental evidence supported a lower valuation. The tribunal found that whilst the rental evidence on both sides was limited and unreliable, the VO's valuation was reasonable. The comparable properties supported the existing Zone A rate, particularly those on the opposite side of the road which were valued lower but still supported the subject property's higher value given its superior location with wider pavements and better footfall potential.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Boots, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; Simpsons Malt Ltd v Jones; Denton v TH White Ltd
- Hearing
- 10 December 2025
Similar decisions
- TAXCA Accountants Ltd, 353 High Street North, E12 6PQ — Dismissed, 19 Sept 2024
- GRND FLR & BSMT 568-570 Barking Road, E13 9JU — Dismissed, 15 May 2024
- UNIT 2 BECKTON RETAIL PARK, ALPINE WAY, E6 6LA — Dismissed, 13 Apr 2023
- Boots, 833 Romford Road, E12 6EA — Allowed, 24 Mar 2021
All decisions in London Borough of Newham · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.