UNIT 2 BECKTON RETAIL PARK, ALPINE WAY, E6 6LA
Retail warehouse and premises Decided 13 April 2023 CHG100633442 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the rateable value should be reduced from £168,000 to £154,000 based on a tone of £110/m² rather than £120/m², arguing that the subject property's larger size compared to Unit 3 should attract a quantum allowance, and pointing to historical reductions between rating lists. The tribunal found a tone of £120/m² had been established for comparable units of similar size on the same retail park, and accepted the Valuation Officer's comparable evidence. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving a lower tone should be applied.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Fresh Bazar Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 17 March 2023
Similar decisions
- 384 Green Street, E13 9AP — Dismissed, 9 Jan 2026
- TAXCA Accountants Ltd, 353 High Street North, E12 6PQ — Dismissed, 19 Sept 2024
- GRND FLR & BSMT 568-570 Barking Road, E13 9JU — Dismissed, 15 May 2024
- Boots, 833 Romford Road, E12 6EA — Allowed, 24 Mar 2021
All decisions in London Borough of Newham · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.