Tribunals · London Borough of Brent · 2017 rating list

Ground Floor, 4 Central Business Centre, NW10 0UR

Warehouse, office and premises Decided 20 June 2025 CHG101168152

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£14,000£126.35/m²
Ratepayer sought£11,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£10,750£126.35/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, on behalf of Rivershop Ltd, challenged the RV of £14,000 on the grounds that the subject property was primarily used for storage rather than office space, and should be valued accordingly at £11,500. The Valuation Officer maintained that the property was suitable for office use based on vacant possession and market rental evidence. The tribunal found Unit 3 (an identical unit) compelling evidence, as it was valued with a large storage component at a lower rate per m² despite the VO describing it as office use. The tribunal allowed the appeal and determined a revised RV of £10,750, allocating 13.38m² as office space, 3.25m² as toilets (non-ratable), and 89.73m² as storage at 30% of the office rate, with appropriate deductions for lack of heating and car parking spaces.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Rivershop Ltd, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Simpsons Malt & Others v Craig Jones; Denton v TH White Ltd
Hearing
29 May 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Brent · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.