Tribunals · Nottingham City Council · 2023 rating list

6Th Flr 6, Cumberland Place, NG1 6HJ

Office and premises Decided 20 January 2026 CHG101182947 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£99,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£0

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought deletion of the subject sixth-floor office (626.36m²) which had undergone a programme of category A fit-out works commencing 20 February 2023. The tribunal found the property was incapable of beneficial occupation on the material day (1 April 2023) because essential rateable items including category B fit-out, partitioning, lighting, small power, ceiling tiles, and data cabling had been stripped out and not replaced, leaving it in a near-shell condition. Following the principles in Monk and Canary Wharf, the tribunal held that a property undergoing redevelopment that lacks the attributes necessary for beneficial occupation is not a hereditament and must be deleted from the rating list.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was FIL Investment Management Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances
  • Building works or disturbance nearby
Change of circumstances
redevelopment works - category A fit out
Evidence
Measurement survey, Photographs
Cases cited
Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v SJ & J Monk (a firm) [2017] UKSC 14; Poplar Assessment Committee v Roberts [1992] 2 AC 93; BNPPDS(J) Limited and BCI Limited (as Trustees of the Blackrock Industrial Trust) v Hitchings (VO) [2025] UKUT 401 (LC); De Silva & Anor v Davis (VO) [1983] 1 EGLR 211; Carey Group Ltd v Ricketts (VO) [2024] UKUT 356 (LC), [2025] RA 65; Jackson (VO) v Canary Wharf [2019] UKUT 136 (LC), [2019] RA 411; Aviva Investors v Bunyan (VO) [2022] VTE CHG100345300, [2023] RA 11; Porter v Trustees of Gladman Sipps [2011] UKUT 204 (LC), [2011] RA 337
Hearing
17 December 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Nottingham City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.