Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Peterborough City Council · 2023 rating list

1 -3 MALLARD BUSINESS CENTRE, MALLARD ROAD, PE3 8YR

Office and premises; Mixed office and warehouse Decided 14 July 2025 CHG101208702 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2023 list£69,500
Ratepayer sought£53,250
VO conceded first£64,500−7% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£64,500from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (1-3 MALLARD BUSINESS CENTRE, MALLARD ROAD, PETERBOROUGH, PE3 8YR). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
1-3 MALLARD BUSINESS CENTRE, MALLARD ROAD, PETERBOROUGH, PE3 8YRThis appeal£69,500£53,250£64,500Dismissed
SUITE 12 & 14 GND FLR, 1 FLAG BUSINESS EXCHANGE, VICARAGE FARM ROAD, PETERBOROUGH PE1 5TX£16,250—£15,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the 2023 rating list valuations of £69,500 and £16,250 (reduced by the VO to £64,500 and £15,000 respectively), proposing reductions to £53,250 and £14,250. The sole issue was the correct unit price per m2 applied to the valuations. The tribunal found that comparable rents from Flag Business Exchange, particularly those dated January 2021 and January 2020, supported the VO's revised rate of £92.50/m2 rather than the appellant's proposed rates of £82/m2 and £87.50/m2. For the freehold Mallard Business Centre property, no comparable rents of similar-sized properties were presented to support a quantum discount.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Eve Taylor (London) Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell (VO) and Leicester City Council [1976] RA 141; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
16 June 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Peterborough City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.