Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Peterborough City Council · 2023 rating list

SUITE 12 & 14 GND FLR 1, FLAG BUSINESS EXCHANGE, VICARAGE FARM ROAD, PE1 5TX

Offices and premises Decided 14 July 2025 CHG101209036 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2023 list£16,250
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£15,000−8% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£15,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (SUITE 12 & 14 GND FLR, 1 FLAG BUSINESS EXCHANGE, VICARAGE FARM ROAD, PETERBOROUGH PE1 5TX). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
1-3 MALLARD BUSINESS CENTRE, MALLARD ROAD, PETERBOROUGH, PE3 8YR£69,500£53,250£64,500Dismissed
SUITE 12 & 14 GND FLR, 1 FLAG BUSINESS EXCHANGE, VICARAGE FARM ROAD, PETERBOROUGH PE1 5TXThis appeal£16,250—£15,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the 2023 rating list entries for two office properties, arguing for lower unit prices per m2 (£82/m2 and £87.50/m2 respectively) based on comparables and quantum allowance principles. The tribunal found that rental evidence from nearby properties on the same site supported the Valuation Officer's revised valuations at £92.50/m2 and dismissed the appeals, noting the appellants failed to provide comparable evidence to support their contentions, particularly for the larger freehold property.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Eve Taylor (London) Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Gardiner and Theobold LLP v Jackson
Hearing
16 June 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Peterborough City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.