Hitachi Rail Europe Ltd, Hitachi Rail Europe Ltd, EC4M 7AW
Offices and premises Decided 20 July 2026 CHG101243804 Graham + Sibbald - Joe McCarthy/Colliers International - Oliver Dowty
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants, represented by Montagu Evans and others, argued that the price per m² of £550 was too high and should be reduced to £535 based on rental evidence from within 60 Ludgate Hill and comparable office assessments. The tribunal found that the rental evidence from within the building (ranging from £504 to £650 per m²) did not support a reduction, with two rents analysed below and two analysed above the adopted price of £550 per m². The tribunal therefore confirmed the original rateable values were not unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Commonwealth Bank of Australia, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 26 June 2026
Similar decisions
- 5 TH FLR 1, BARTHOLOMEW LANE, EC2N 2AX — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2026
- Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, Petronas Energy Trading Ltd, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Equistone Partners Europe Limited, PT 6TH FLR 60 Ludgate Hill, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
- Ropes & Gray International Llp, 5th Floor South, EC4M 7AW — Dismissed, 20 Jul 2026
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.