3 Kings Street, IP24 2AN
Shop and premises Decided 11 August 2025 CHG101260096 MBM Solicitors - Anjali Thakrar
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant contended that the subject retail properties had been severely damaged during illegal cannabis farming operations and were in such a state of disrepair that repair costs would be uneconomic to undertake, warranting deletion from the rating list. The tribunal found that while the properties were in disrepair, the revised repair costs of approximately £100,581 and £82,594 respectively would be recouped within a reasonable timeframe (4.52 years and 3.23 years), meaning a hypothetical landlord would undertake the repairs. Accordingly, the properties are deemed to be in reasonable repair under Schedule 6 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988, and the appeals were dismissed with the RVs confirmed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Davina Investments Properties Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- State of repair or deletion
- Evidence
- Expert report
- Cases cited
- Foote v Gibson (VO); 16/18 Princes Street (Ipswich) Ltd v Bond (VO)
- Hearing
- 22 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 5 Kings Street, IP24 2AN — Dismissed, 11 Aug 2025
- Jollyes, Thetford Retail Park, Lime Kiln Lane, Lime Kiln Lane, IP24 2BU — Dismissed, 2 Oct 2023
All decisions in Breckland District Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.