5 Kings Street, IP24 2AN
Shop and premises Decided 11 August 2025 CHG101260103 MBM Solicitors - Anjali Thakrar
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, owner of two retail units in Thetford discovered to have been illegally used as cannabis farms in February 2023, argued that extensive repairs costing approximately £300,000 were uneconomic to undertake, such that the properties should be treated as not capable of repair. The tribunal found that based on updated repair cost surveys totalling £100,581 and £82,594 respectively, amortization analysis showed a reasonable landlord would recoup costs within 3-4 years and thereafter receive rental income into perpetuity, making the repairs economic under Schedule 6 LGFA 1988. The appeals were dismissed and the original rateable values confirmed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Davina Investments Properties Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- State of repair or deletion
- Evidence
- Expert report
- Cases cited
- Foote v Gibson (VO); 16/18 Princes Street (Ipswich) Ltd v Bond (VO)
- Hearing
- 22 July 2025
Similar decisions
- 3 Kings Street, IP24 2AN — Dismissed, 11 Aug 2025
- Jollyes, Thetford Retail Park, Lime Kiln Lane, Lime Kiln Lane, IP24 2BU — Dismissed, 2 Oct 2023
All decisions in Breckland District Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.