Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Wandsworth · 2023 rating list

104, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, SW15 1RG

Shop and premises Decided 9 November 2026 CHG101273418 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£72,500
Ratepayer sought£64,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£66,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (104, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1RG). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
104, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1RGThis appeal£72,500£64,000£66,000Allowed in part
108, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1RG£83,000£75,500£75,500Allowed
124, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1RG£58,500£53,500£53,500Allowed
GND FL 135, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1SU£54,500£36,250£39,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The Appellants sought reduced rateable values on four Putney High Street retail properties, arguing for lower price per m² based on rental evidence from the same parades. The Tribunal adopted a price of £1,050/m² for three properties (instead of £1,150/m²) and £710/m² for the fourth (instead of £1,000/m²), finding the rental evidence from the subject properties' parades more persuasive than evidence from a distant property near Putney railway station. For 104 Putney High Street, the Tribunal determined £66,000 (between the original £72,500 and the sought £64,000) after rejecting the Appellant's initial challenge to the basement storage relativity.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Techtique International Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v Jackson
Hearing
16 October 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.