Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Wandsworth · 2023 rating list

GND FL 135, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, SW15 1SU

Shop and premises Decided 9 November 2026 CHG101343891 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2023 list£54,500
Ratepayer sought£36,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£39,000from 1 Apr 2023

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (GND FL 135, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1SU). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
104, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1RG£72,500£64,000£66,000Allowed in part
108, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1RG£83,000£75,500£75,500Allowed
124, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1RG£58,500£53,500£53,500Allowed
GND FL 135, PUTNEY HIGH STREET, LONDON, SW15 1SUThis appeal£54,500£36,250£39,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant for the first property (104 Putney High Street) sought reduction from £72,500 to £64,000 RV, arguing that rental evidence from the same parade supported a lower rate of £1,050/m² instead of £1,150/m². The tribunal was more persuaded by rental evidence from the subject properties' own parades over evidence from 174 Putney High Street, which was over 200 metres away in a different location. The tribunal adopted £1,050/m² and agreed the basement relativity was A/10 (not A/20), resulting in a revised RV of £66,000, allowing the appeal in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Techtique International Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v Jackson
Hearing
16 October 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.