EASYPACK, FINCHLEY AVENUE, MILDENHALL, IP28 7BG
Factory and premises Decided 8 May 2026 CHG101368898 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, represented by a surveyor, argued that the tone of value for main space should be reduced from £30 per m² to £25.75 per m², relying primarily on a comparable property at 5 Wimbledon Avenue where a settlement had fixed the tone at £25.25 per m². The tribunal found the appellant's comparable evidence insufficiently persuasive, particularly because the reference property was in a different market area with less prominent location. The tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence from hereditaments on the same industrial estate, which supported tones at or above £30 per m². The tribunal concluded the adopted tone of £30.00 per m² was fair and reasonable and reflected an allowance for quantum given the subject property's larger size.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was EASYPACK/POP DISPLAYS GROUP LIMITED, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobold LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 22 April 2026
Similar decisions
- UNIT 1, KINGS WARREN BUSINESS PARK, MANNOR WOOD ROAD, RED LODGE, RED LODGE, IP28 8WG — Allowed in part, 5 May 2026
- CLAAS UK LTD, STATION WORKS, LITTLE SAXHAM, IP28 6QZ — Allowed, 12 Jan 2026
- 227, LONDON ROAD,, IP27 0NE — Allowed in part, 26 Nov 2025
All decisions in West Suffolk Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.