Split of plot D14-0-RET11, Unit 1, 6 Marlborough Walk, GU9 7WR
Retail and residential units in mixed-use development Decided 20 February 2026 VT00031602 Colliers / Surrey County Council
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 27 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Split of Plot D14-0-RET11, Unit 1, 6 Marlborough Walk). Every property is listed below.
The 27 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them; this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| 2 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| 3 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| 4 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| 7 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D20 Ru01, Unit 1, 13 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D20 Ru01, Unit 2, 13 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D1 Ret 8, 9 Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Merger of plot D12-RU01 & D12-RU02, Brightwell House, Old Market Place | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D14-0-RET13, 14 East Street | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot Ru7, 5 Nightingale Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6 0 Ret14, 1 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6 0 Ret15, 3 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6 0 Ret16, 5 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D14-0-RET12, Unit 1, 4 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D14-0-RET12, Unit 2, 4 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D14-0-RET11, Unit 1, 6 Marlborough WalkThis appeal | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D14-0-RET11, Unit 2, 6 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6-0-Ret 17, 7 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D14-0-RET10, Unit 1, 8 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Split of Plot D14-0-RET10, Unit 2, 8 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6-0-Ret 18, 9 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D1 Ret 09, 10 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6 0 RET19, 11 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6 0 RET20, 13 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6 0 RET21, 15 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
| Plot D6 0 RET22, 17 Marlborough Walk | — | — | — | Allowed in part |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant council challenged the billing authority's completion notice dated 5 June 2025 requiring properties to be treated as complete from 6 June 2025, arguing that the remaining fitting out work could not reasonably be completed by that date and sought a date of 30 November 2026. The tribunal found that with an approximate two-week fitting-out time per unit and considering the varying sizes and types, it was reasonable to expect all properties could be completed by 1 July 2025, and therefore allowed the appeals in part by amending the completion date accordingly.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Surrey County Council, represented.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- Photographs
- Cases cited
- Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Newham London Borough Council; Post Office v Nottingham City Council
- Hearing
- 2 December 2025
Similar decisions
- 117 High Street, GU7 1AQ — Dismissed, 15 Jun 2026
- 2 Old Market Place, GU9 7SF — Allowed in part, 20 Feb 2026
- 3 Old Market Place, GU9 7SF — Allowed in part, 20 Feb 2026
- 1 Old Market Place, GU9 7SF — Allowed in part, 20 Feb 2026
All decisions in Waverley Borough Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.