Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant requested that the appeal be heard in their absence and submitted no further information or evidence. The Valuation Officer confirmed no evidence had been received to demonstrate physical changes to support the original proposal to split the hereditament. The tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the absence of any supporting evidence.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Hearing
- 18 July 2019
Similar decisions
- Chalet 66, Happy Valley Chalet Park, Tywyn LL36 9HU — Dismissed, 26 Feb 2020
- Cig Porthmadog Meats, Porthmadog, LL49 9HA — Dismissed, 9 Jan 2019
- Lleyn Tyre Service, North Quay, PWLLHELI, LL53 5YR — Dismissed, 9 Jan 2019
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.