Bod Erw, The Roe, St Asaph, LL17 0LA
Restaurant and premises Decided 16 January 2019 683030980051/285NV17/29 Valuation Tribunal for Wales
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought to reduce the rateable value of a rural restaurant from £26,500 to £12,500, arguing the £85/m² tone was excessive compared to comparable properties ranging from £45-£120/m² with £60/m² being most common, and that the valuation should reflect the property's out-of-town location and the challenges facing rural licensed premises. The tribunal accepted the rental method of valuation was correct based on opening hours and layout, but found the appellant had not presented substantive evidence to support the reduction and the valuation officer's comparables (particularly the Radhuni Indian Restaurant at £77.61/m²) were reliable indicators that the £85/m² tone was not excessive or unfair.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Measurement survey
- Hearing
- 26 November 2019
Similar decisions
- The Mason Arms, Rhyl Road, Denbigh — Dismissed, 3 Jan 2020
- Time Share Complex and Premises, Graig Park, AlltY-Graig, Dyserth, Rhyl LL18 6DX — Dismissed, 24 Jul 2019
- Hotel & Premises, 25-26 East Parade, Rhyl House, Ffordd Derwen, Rhyl, Denbighshire LL18 2LS — Dismissed, 24 Jul 2019
- Clwyd Gate Restaurant, Llanbedr Dyffryn Clwyd, Ruthin LL15 1YF — Dismissed, 14 Mar 2019
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.