Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not attend the hearing and submitted no written evidence to support her contention that the subject property was a food-led business rather than a public house. The Valuation Officer noted that the appellant had provided only eight comparable properties with lower rateable values but no substantive evidence. The tribunal dismissed the appeal for lack of prosecution under Regulation 30(4), as the appellant provided insufficient evidence to support her case.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Similar decisions
- Public House and Premises, Star Inn, Caerleon Road, Ponthir, Newport NP18 1GZ — Dismissed, 11 Feb 2020
- Public House and Premises, Star Inn, Caerleon Road, Ponthir, Newport NP18 1GZ — Dismissed, 11 Feb 2020
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.