Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, operating a restaurant, challenged the rateable value of £12,000, arguing that parking was inadequate, the location was poor due to a busy road, and there were vacant nearby units. The Valuation Officer relied on passing rent of £16,500 and comparable rents in the area, noting that the premises would be valued as retail space under the rating hypothesis. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the current rent passing (£16,500) and earlier rent (£13,500 in June 2015) both exceeded the rateable value, and the appellant provided no rental evidence to the contrary; the Tribunal held that issues such as parking and location would be reflected in the passing rent.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Zoning or layout
- Change of circumstances
- Other
- Evidence
- Rents
- Hearing
- 5 March 2020
Similar decisions
- Unit 3 The Pod 2, Leckwith Road, Cardiff, CF11 8EG — Agreed at hearing, 3 Sept 2026
- Restaurant and Premises, 11 Heol-Y-Deri, Cardiff CF14 6HA — Dismissed, 14 Jun 2021
- Public House and Premises, The Cricketers, 66 Cathedral Road, Cardiff CF119LL — Dismissed, 11 Feb 2020
- Public House and Premises, Kings Arms, Church Road, Pentyrch, Cardiff CF15 9QF — Dismissed, 11 Feb 2020
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.