Free news & data alerts
Tribunals · Wales · Gwynedd · 2017 rating list

Glan Y Bala, Llanberis, Caernarfon LL55 4TY

Self-catering holiday unit and premises Decided 31 March 2020 681029756186/541NV17/26 Valuation Tribunal for Wales

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2017 list£12,000
Ratepayer sought£6,000
VO conceded first£9,600−20% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£9,600

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the rateable value should be reduced from £12,000 to £6,000, claiming the bed space valuation method was flawed and that the rating system penalised property improvements. The Valuation Officer maintained the value of £9,600 based on the established practice of valuing self-catering properties with 4 units or fewer using a price per bed space method. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the appellants had not adduced sufficient evidence to undermine the Valuation Officer's valuation and that the established valuation method had been properly applied.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method · decisive
Evidence
Settled assessments
Cases cited
Dennett v Crisp (VO); Redrose Limited v Thomas (VO); Beaconside Country House & Cottages v Gidman (VO); Wishhart v Hulse (VO)
Hearing
20 February 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Gwynedd ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Read it on valuationtribunalwales.net

Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.