Free news & data alerts
Tribunals · Wales · Conwy · 2017 rating list

Unit 9, Tir Llwyd Enterprise Park, Kinmel Bay, Rhyl LL18 5JZ

Workshop and premises Decided 9 April 2020 690529784455/541NV17/3 Valuation Tribunal for Wales agent) / Mr K Batty (surveyor

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£91,500
Ratepayer sought£88,000
VO conceded first£93,000
Tribunal decided£93,000£39/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, represented by a surveyor, contended that the property should be revalued from £91,500 to £88,000, arguing that a low structural wall in the main workshop created a disability affecting the property's rentability and that a 5% allowance for fragmentation should be made. The tribunal found that the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence to sustain the contention of a disability that would affect the rent payable, and that the Valuation Officer had correctly valued the property using GIA measurements in accordance with the RICS Code of Measuring Practice. The appeal was dismissed and the rating list was amended from £91,500 to £93,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Evadx Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Floor area or measurement
  • Quantum or end allowance · decisive
Evidence
Measurement survey, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Edmundson Electrical Ltd v Mr R Roberts
Hearing
20 February 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Conwy ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Read it on valuationtribunalwales.net

Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.