Free news & data alerts
Tribunals · Wales · Conwy · 2017 rating list

15 Lloyd Street, Llandudno LL30 2UU

Shop and premises Decided 25 February 2021 690530812619/285NV17 Valuation Tribunal for Wales

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to split the property into 20 separate assessments for individual dealers occupying taped-off areas on monthly tenancy agreements. The Valuation Officer contended the arrangement lacked the necessary elements of rateable occupation, particularly exclusivity and permanence. The Tribunal found that the taped areas did not constitute exclusive occupation (dealers shared responsibility for transactions), and the monthly agreements were too transient to satisfy the permanence requirement established in case law. The Tribunal concluded the appellant retained paramount control and dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment · decisive
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
John Laing & Sons Ltd v Kingswood Area Assessment Committee; Holywell Union Assessment Committee v Halkyn District Mines Drainage Co; Vines Ltd v de Mauny; London County Council v Wilkins; Sir Robert McAlpine & Sons Ltd v Payne
Hearing
9 December 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Conwy ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Read it on valuationtribunalwales.net

Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.