Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant's agent requested an adjournment by email in his absence to obtain lease terms and rental information. The Valuation Officer objected and requested dismissal due to the agent's failure to adhere to appeal procedures and lack of prosecution, noting no substantive response had been received despite correspondence sent on 2 August and 24 August 2023. The tribunal found the agent had failed to follow the appeal process and lacked in prosecution, and therefore dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Laporsa Tiles, represented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Hearing
- 6 September 2023
Similar decisions
- Unit 59 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5YT — Dismissed, 6 Dec 2023
- Warehouse and Premises, 55 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5BD — Dismissed, 13 Sept 2023
- Factory and Premises, 60 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5YT — Dismissed, 13 Sept 2023
- Factory and Premises, 93 Springvale Industrial Estate, Cwmbran NP44 5BH — Dismissed, 13 Sept 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.