Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant requested an adjournment via email received late on the day before the hearing, claiming an oversight in not submitting the attendance proforma within the required 7-day period. The Valuation Officer opposed the adjournment, noting the appeal had already been postponed twice and that the appellant had not provided requested information. The tribunal dismissed the appeal in the absence of the appellant.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was W M Properties Ltd, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Hearing
- 24 October 2023
Similar decisions
- 38, Bridge Street, Caernarfon, LL55 1AF — Dismissed
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision of the Valuation Tribunal for Wales, published at valuationtribunalwales.net and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.